Testing the animations:
I chose a student in the class to test my product and check if it works properly. The student first checked the organ systems animations. After checking the animation without stopping, the student watched it all over again to see if it is meeting a list of things that has makes the software successful. I gave a list of things to the students and he checked if these things met the standards. The list included: Background changes, talking sprites, If the sprite is in the right positions, if the broadcasted messages are being receives and etc. All of the things in the list worked. So this shows that the first animation was successful. Then the student checked the second one and to observe if the details in the quiz. Like before, I make a list of things to check to see if they were working. Then the student checked if the these things worked. Things in the list included if the questions were shown, if each of the option can be clicked on, if there is a score in the end, if the music plays properly etc. All the things on the list was succesful. I wanted to see if the animations work from different viewpoints, so the Ms.Lubnah (my interviewee) also observed both the animations and checked the things on the list. All of the things on the lists were successful.
Improvements:
I chose a student in the class to test my product and check if it works properly. The student first checked the organ systems animations. After checking the animation without stopping, the student watched it all over again to see if it is meeting a list of things that has makes the software successful. I gave a list of things to the students and he checked if these things met the standards. The list included: Background changes, talking sprites, If the sprite is in the right positions, if the broadcasted messages are being receives and etc. All of the things in the list worked. So this shows that the first animation was successful. Then the student checked the second one and to observe if the details in the quiz. Like before, I make a list of things to check to see if they were working. Then the student checked if the these things worked. Things in the list included if the questions were shown, if each of the option can be clicked on, if there is a score in the end, if the music plays properly etc. All the things on the list was succesful. I wanted to see if the animations work from different viewpoints, so the Ms.Lubnah (my interviewee) also observed both the animations and checked the things on the list. All of the things on the lists were successful.
Improvements:
- I could have had audio the organ systems animation and the quiz. This will make the audience more engaged and would also give them a better chance to understand the information since it would be stuck it in their head.
- For the quiz, I could have made the questions timed. This would be better for the students to improve their time management skills.
- For the quiz, I could have could have made the theme and backgrounds more colourful. This will attract the students.
Impact on the audience:
- The students will enjoy learning more since both the animations are very interactive and educating.
- The quiz will refresh the student's mind and would also be great as a revisions for and assessment.
- Teachers can use these animations to help their students and to make the student's learning more engaging and fun
- Teachers can use this for students with special needs as its is very easy to understand.
- All students of any kind of level of knowledge could use it to broaden their knowledge and understanding about organ systems.
- Students all around the world who have access to the internet can use this to study about organ systems.
- These can help teachers to find another way of teaching other than using books
Peer evaluation:
Expert Evaluation:






















